The deep layer · what was written
Rags to Riches (Booker): the entry
Definition
Rags to Riches is the second of the seven plots in Christopher Booker’s The Seven Basic Plots (2004). It is a plot, not an archetype and not a character type. The name, an everyday expression, here labels the shape of a whole story. At the start the hero or heroine is of no account: an orphan, a drudge, a youngest child, someone the people around them scorn. Something sends them out into the world, where they meet an early, partial success, often a first glimpse of the person they will marry and of a better life. Then everything is lost. Booker calls this the central crisis, and it splits the story into two halves. In the second half the hero, now standing alone, has to come through a final ordeal against a rival or dark figure before the ending: union with the right partner and the inheritance of a kingdom, literal or not.
Booker lays the plot out in five named stages: initial wretchedness at home and the call; out into the world, with initial success; the central crisis; independence and the final ordeal; and final union, completion and fulfilment. He reads it through Jung. The riches are not the point. What the story shows, for Booker, is a hidden and better self coming into its own, as when Andersen’s duckling turns out to have been a swan all along, and the first success cannot last because the hero has not yet grown into it. That reading is his frame, not a finding.
History
Booker published the book in London with Continuum in November 2004; an American edition followed in 2005, the paperback was later reprinted under the Bloomsbury imprint, and a twentieth-anniversary edition with a preface by Nicholas Booker appeared in 2024. Rags to Riches is chapter 3 of Part One, “The Seven Gateways to the Underworld”. The name is not his; what he adds is the structure, and above all the central crisis.
His examples, checked against the text of the paperback reprint, start in the nursery and move to the novel. Andersen’s The Ugly Duckling opens the chapter (pp. 51, 54, 57–58) as the simplest version. Cinderella (pp. 52, 54, 58), Puss in Boots (pp. 55–56) and Dick Whittington (pp. 57–58) give the folk-tale form, and Aladdin shows the central crisis at work: the hero rises, marries the princess, and loses palace and wife to the sorcerer while he is away. The novels follow: David Copperfield (pp. 53–54), Charlotte Brontë’s Jane Eyre (pp. 54, 60, 63–65), with Moll Flanders (p. 65) and Great Expectations named as further cases, and Chaplin’s silent film The Gold Rush (p. 59), whose two halves are divided by the moment the tramp’s hopes collapse. Booker also gives the plot a dark version, in which the climb is made for egotistic ends and ends in ruin; his full case of it is Stendhal’s Le Rouge et le Noir (1830), whose hero, Booker complains, Stendhal failed to see as a “monster of egotism” (as quoted by Kakutani 2005).
Booker claims Jung as the source of the meaning, and folk tale as the source of the pattern. The pattern claim is the stronger one, since the folk tales he starts from are old and widespread. Kakutani (2005) observed that much of Booker’s theory came, not always acknowledged, from Freud, Jung, Bettelheim, Frazer and the Opies. The five stages, the name as one of seven plots and the Jungian reading are Booker’s, dated 2004.
The debate
What kind of thing is it? In the void the plot sits nearest the child and the hero, because its hero begins small and overlooked and finishes whole. But it is neither figure. Jung’s child is an archetype of potential and futurity; Booker’s Rags to Riches is a sequence of stages with a cast of roles, the scorned hero, the helpers, the dark rival and the prince or princess. Booker’s reading of the final union as wholeness borrows Jung’s language of the self without making the plot an archetype in Jung’s sense. The site lists the seven as plots, by the editor’s decision.
The reviewers’ objections bear on this plot because its happy ending is a marriage, and with it Booker’s scheme of masculine and feminine values. Adam Mars-Jones (2004) noted that in Booker’s scheme the heroine’s role is to represent qualities the hero absorbs, and asked how the mature person Booker describes could be a woman at all. Kasia Boddy (2004) objected that Booker’s happy ending requires “girls to be girls and boys to be boys”, and that most of the examples he used to establish his plots come from the very post-Romantic period he later condemns. Kakutani (2005) praised the collation of parallels in the early chapters but judged the treatment of modern literature narrow, and the Le Rouge et le Noir complaint is one of her examples. Publishers Weekly (2005) called the biographical analysis of authors simplistic.
Empirical status
None. No study has tested Rags to Riches as a category that texts or readers actually sort into. The plot is easily confused with an empirical finding of the same name. Reagan and colleagues (2016), classifying the emotional arcs of 1,327 Project Gutenberg works, found six core arcs and called the steadily rising one “Rags to riches”. That arc is a curve of sentiment across a text, not Booker’s plot. The authors cite Booker but state that an arc is not a plot, and give this case as their example: Booker’s Overcoming the Monster and Rags to Riches may share an emotional arc while being distinct plots. Their study neither supports nor refutes his scheme.
Appearances
The plot is a fixture of writing advice. Jericho Writers’ guide to the seven plots gives Cinderella, Jane Eyre, Aladdin and Memoirs of a Geisha as examples and notes that the riches need not be literal. Shmoop’s study guides file works such as Pygmalion, Little Dorrit and Vanity Fair under the plot in their “Booker’s Seven Basic Plots Analysis” pages. These are later readings in his scheme, not his examples.
Sources
- Booker, C. (2004). The Seven Basic Plots: Why We Tell Stories. London: Continuum. ISBN 978-0-8264-5209-2. Part One, ch. 3, “Rags to Riches”.
- Booker, C. (2004/2013). The Seven Basic Plots (paperback reprint, Bloomsbury). ISBN 978-0-8264-8037-8. Page numbers above are from this printing, checked in the Internet Archive copy: https://archive.org/details/sevenbasicplotsw0000book_v4w4
- Booker, C. (2024). The Seven Basic Plots (20th anniversary edition, preface by Nicholas Booker). Bloomsbury. ISBN 978-1-3994-1592-7. Chapter 3: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781399417440.ch-03
- Mars-Jones, A. (2004, 21 November). Terminator 2 good, The Odyssey bad. The Observer. https://www.theguardian.com/books/2004/nov/21/fiction.features
- Boddy, K. (2004, 21 November). Everything ever written boiled down to seven plots. The Telegraph. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/books/3632074/Everything-ever-written-boiled-down-to-seven-plots.html
- Publishers Weekly (2005, 14 February). Review of The Seven Basic Plots. https://www.publishersweekly.com/9780826452092
- Kakutani, M. (2005, 15 April). The plot thins, or are no stories new? The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2005/04/15/books/15book.html
- Reagan, A. J., Mitchell, L., Kiley, D., Danforth, C. M., & Dodds, P. S. (2016). The emotional arcs of stories are dominated by six basic shapes. EPJ Data Science, 5, 31. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-016-0093-1 (appendix A, arXiv:1606.07772)
- Jericho Writers. How to write seven basic plots. https://jerichowriters.com/how-to-write-seven-basic-plots/
- Shmoop. Vanity Fair: Booker’s Seven Basic Plots Analysis. https://www.shmoop.com/study-guides/vanity-fair-thackeray/rags-to-riches-plot.html