The deep layer · what was written
Tragedy (Booker): the entry
Definition
Tragedy is the sixth of the seven plots in Christopher Booker’s The Seven Basic Plots (2004), and the one that breaks the pattern of the others. It is a plot, not an archetype and not a character. The name describes the shape of a whole story. A hero who is restless or unfulfilled is drawn towards some forbidden object or course of action: power, a lover, knowledge, a crime. Having committed himself, he does well for a while and seems to have got what he wanted. Then things begin to go wrong, he loses control, and to keep what he has seized he does worse and worse things. The forces he has roused close in, and the story ends in his destruction, at the hands of others or by his own choice.
Booker sets the plot out in five named stages: an Anticipation Stage, a Dream Stage, a Frustration Stage, a Nightmare Stage, and a Destruction or Death-Wish Stage. Four of them are the names he gives the stages of Overcoming the Monster, and the parallel is plain. In the happy plots the hero moves through darkness to wholeness; in Tragedy, as Booker put it in words Michiko Kakutani (2005) quoted, the hero is “held back by some fatal flaw or weakness” and doomed to fall short. He reads this through Jung: the tragic hero is an ego so taken over by the dark power that, in his third tragedy chapter, the hero has become the monster, and his destruction restores the wider order he violated. That reading is his frame, not a finding.
History
Booker published the book in London with Continuum in November 2004; an American edition followed in 2005, the paperback was later reprinted under the Bloomsbury imprint, and a twentieth-anniversary edition with a preface by Nicholas Booker appeared in 2024. Tragedy takes three chapters of Part One, “The Seven Gateways to the Underworld”, more than any other plot.
Chapter 8, “The Five Stages”, opens with five stories chosen because they look unlike one another, checked against the text of the paperback reprint: the Greek myth of Icarus, the German legend of Faust (pp. 154, 156), Shakespeare’s Macbeth (p. 154), Stevenson’s Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde and Nabokov’s Lolita (pp. 154–155). Further examples follow: Wilde’s The Picture of Dorian Gray (pp. 158–159), Bizet’s Carmen (pp. 159–160), the film Bonnie and Clyde (pp. 160–161), Truffaut’s Jules et Jim (pp. 161–162), and, as two final examples of the plot in its full form, Anna Karenina (pp. 162–164) and Madame Bovary (pp. 164–166). Julius Caesar (pp. 166–167) is read as the tragedy of Brutus. Chapter 9, “The Divided Self”, takes up heroes and heroines pulled two ways, with Antony and Cleopatra among its cases. Chapter 10, “The Hero as Monster”, takes heroes who themselves become the monster, with Richard III and Jekyll, and then turns to tragedies of redemption, where the hero has a change of heart before the end: King Lear (pp. 184–185), Wagner’s Tannhäuser, the story of Samson (p. 186), the Oresteia (pp. 187–189) and Romeo and Juliet (pp. 189–190). Later in the book Booker reads Citizen Kane as a mystery shaped by the five stages of Tragedy, and gives a separate chapter to Oedipus Tyrannus and Hamlet.
Booker’s sources are partly plain. The flaw goes back to Aristotle’s account of tragedy, and Kakutani (2005) named the Shakespeare critic A. C. Bradley among the writers whose ideas on Tragedy and Comedy Booker reworked, not always with acknowledgement. The five stages, the three-chapter scheme, the place of Tragedy among seven plots and the Jungian reading are Booker’s, dated 2004.
The debate
What kind of thing is it? In the void the plot sits nearest the shadow and the hero, because Booker’s tragic hero is a hero possessed. It is neither figure. Jung’s shadow is the unacknowledged side of a personality, an archetype in his sense; Booker’s Tragedy is a sequence of stages, and his “dark power” is a structural role in every plot, not Jung’s concept. The site lists the seven as plots, by the editor’s decision.
Tragedy is also where the reviewers tested the scheme hardest. Adam Mars-Jones (2004) granted that for more than two hundred pages Booker deals with plots as shapes, extracting a single five-part template from Icarus, Faust, Macbeth, Jekyll and Hyde and Lolita, but objected that a plot is only one element of a work, and that Booker has nothing to say about the others. He judged the chapter on Oedipus Rex and Hamlet the best in the book, because those two masterpieces are exceptions to some of Booker’s own rules. Kakutani (2005) found Booker’s arguments about Tragedy and Comedy “highly familiar”, and Publishers Weekly (2005) said Booker accused those who disagree with him of “limited ego-consciousness”, which did not help his case.
Empirical status
None. No study has tested Booker’s Tragedy as a category that texts or readers actually sort into. Reagan and colleagues (2016), who classified the emotional arcs of 1,327 Project Gutenberg works into six shapes, name two of their arcs after tragic myths, “Icarus” (rise then fall) and “Oedipus” (fall, rise, fall), and give Anna Karenina as Booker’s example of this plot. But they state that an emotional arc is not a plot, so their result neither supports nor refutes his scheme.
Appearances
In writing advice Booker’s Tragedy is usually taught through Macbeth, his own example. Jericho Writers’ guide to the seven plots adds Lolita, Othello, King Lear, Frankenstein, The Great Gatsby and Anna Karenina. Shmoop’s study guides file The Great Gatsby, Madame Bovary and Aeschylus’s Agamemnon under the plot in their “Booker’s Seven Basic Plots Analysis” pages. These are later readings in Booker’s scheme; The Great Gatsby, for instance, is not among his tragedies.
Sources
- Booker, C. (2004). The Seven Basic Plots: Why We Tell Stories. London: Continuum. ISBN 978-0-8264-5209-2. Part One, chs 8–10.
- Booker, C. (2004/2013). The Seven Basic Plots (paperback reprint, Bloomsbury). ISBN 978-0-8264-8037-8. Page numbers above are from this printing, checked in the Internet Archive copy: https://archive.org/details/sevenbasicplotsw0000book_v4w4
- Booker, C. (2024). The Seven Basic Plots (20th anniversary edition, preface by Nicholas Booker). Bloomsbury. ISBN 978-1-3994-1592-7. Chapter 8: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781399417440.ch-08
- Mars-Jones, A. (2004, 21 November). Terminator 2 good, The Odyssey bad. The Observer. https://www.theguardian.com/books/2004/nov/21/fiction.features
- Publishers Weekly (2005, 14 February). Review of The Seven Basic Plots. https://www.publishersweekly.com/9780826452092
- Kakutani, M. (2005, 15 April). The plot thins, or are no stories new? The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2005/04/15/books/15book.html
- Reagan, A. J., Mitchell, L., Kiley, D., Danforth, C. M., & Dodds, P. S. (2016). The emotional arcs of stories are dominated by six basic shapes. EPJ Data Science, 5, 31. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-016-0093-1 (appendix A, arXiv:1606.07772)
- Jericho Writers. How to write seven basic plots. https://jerichowriters.com/how-to-write-seven-basic-plots/
- Shmoop. The Great Gatsby: Booker’s Seven Basic Plots Analysis. https://www.shmoop.com/study-guides/great-gatsby/tragedy-plot.html